Clinical effects of atorvastatin combined with conbercept in the treatment of patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion and carotid plaque: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs have been widely used in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO); however, recurrence is a major concern. This study aims to observe the clinical effects of atorvastatin and intravitreal therapy in the treatment of patients with branch or central RVO-ME and coexistent carotid plaques (CP). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted. Sixty-four patients diagnosed with branch or central RVO-ME and coexistent CP will be enrolled and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the control and experimental groups. The control group will be treated with intravitreal conbercept monthly for 3 months, followed by monthly evaluation and injection of pro re nata (PRN) for 12 months, while the experimental group will be treated with oral atorvastatin 20 mg daily combined with the control group treatment. If a drop of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) is more than five Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (one line) or an increment in central subfield thickness (CSFT) of 100 µm (or a 10% increment from the previous visit), intravitreal re-treatment will be performed. Outcome measurements include CSFT, BCVA, number of injections, and incidence of adverse events during the 12-month follow-up period. Differences between groups will be evaluated using Student's t-test, and comparisons between groups will be evaluated using repeated-measures analysis of variance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nanjing Lishui People's Hospital, Nanjing, China (approval number 2023KY0418-12, dated 18 April 2023), and has been registered on chictr.org.cn. Written informed consent will be collected from each patient and the results of this trial will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300071359. Registered on 12 May 2023.

Combination therapy of metformin and atorvastatin against benzopyrene-induced lung cancer via inflammatory signaling pathway.

The most prevalent cause of lung cancer is smoking tobacco, but exposure to second hand smoke, air pollution, and certain chemicals and substances at work can also raise the risk of disease. In this study, we scrutinized the chemoprotective effect of the metformin and atorvastatin combination against benzo[a]pyrene (BaP)-induced lung cancer in mice of Swiss albino. BaP (50 mg/kg) was used for induction of lung cancer and mice were treated with metformin, atorvastatin or their combination. Metformin + atorvastatin combination significantly (p< 0.001) improved the body weight, liver weight, suppressed the lung weight and tumor incidence and altered the levels of immunocompetent cells, polyamines, lung tumor markers, lung parameters and antioxidant parameters, respectively. Metformin + atorvastatin combination also suppressed cytokines levels, inflammatory parameters and caspase parameters. On the basis of the results, we can conclude that metformin + atorvastatin combination remarkably suppressed lung cancer via the inflammatory pathway.

Statin-induced debilitating weakness and myopathy.

A large percentage of the US population is either receiving or should be considered for statin therapy. Whether through primary or secondary prevention for atherosclerotic disease, statins remain one of the mainstay options available to physicians. Myalgias are the most commonly reported side effects, though largely self-limited and subjective in nature. Here, we report a case of drug-related myonecrosis following long-term use of atorvastatin. Prompt recognition of the condition and initiation of treatment is paramount to control the disease's progression. While high-dose steroids are first line, quick escalation to methotrexate, IVIG or rituximab should be considered in refractory cases. This decision is guided by monitoring of serum markers such as CK and transaminases. The goal is quick normalisation of these enzymes, signalling cessation of underlying muscle necrosis. Patients may never regain full function and treatment can last months to years.

Atorvastatin for reduction of 28-day mortality in severe and critical COVID-19 patients: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is an abnormal host response to the SARS-CoV-2 infection, which is associated with endothelial dysfunction and multi-organ failure. Atorvastatin has been proposed to reduce COVID-19 severity and mortality in chronic and de-novo users. METHODS: This randomized double-blind trial included 220 COVID-19 patients admitted to Mansoura University's isolation hospital in Egypt. One hundred and ten cases were given 40 mg of atorvastatin once daily for 28 days (group A), while 110 received a placebo (group B). All patients received treatment as per hospital protocol. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at 28 days. We also tracked 6-month mortality, time to clinical improvement, the risk of invasive mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury, potential adverse events, and hospital and intensive care length of stay. RESULTS: The 28-day all-cause mortality was 52/104 (50%) in group A vs. 54/103 (52.4%) in group B, odds ratio (OR) = 0.907 (0.526, 1.565), P = 0.727; adjusted OR = 0.773 (0.407, 1.47), P = 0.433. Six-month mortality occurred in 53/102 (52%) and 59/79 (60.8%) in group A vs. B, respectively, P = 0.208. Among hospital survivors in group A vs. group B, the median time to clinical improvement was 10 days (7-14) vs. 10 (7-15), P = 0.715; the duration of hospital stay was 10 days (7-14) vs. 10 (8-17), P = 0.378. Discontinuation was higher in group B (four vs. one), but statistically insignificant, P = 0.369. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with severe or critical COVID-19, atorvastatin did not reduce the risk of 28-day or 6-month mortality and did not shorten the length of hospital stay or time to clinical improvement. Trial registration Clinical Trial Registry (NCT04952350) on July 1st, 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04952350.

Atorvastatin-associated myotoxicity: A toxicokinetic review of pharmacogenetic associations to evaluate the feasibility of precision pharmacotherapy.

Atorvastatin (ATV) and other statins are highly effective in reducing cholesterol levels. However, in some patients, the development of drug-associated muscle side effects remains an issue as it compromises the adherence to treatment. Since the toxicity is dose-dependent, exploring factors modulating pharmacokinetics (PK) appears fundamental. The purpose of this review aims at reporting the current state of knowledge about the singular genetic susceptibilities influencing the risk of developing ATV muscle adverse events through PK modulations. Multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in efflux (ABCB1, ABCC1, ABCC2, ABCC4 and ABCG2) and influx (SLCO1B1, SLCO1B3 and SLCO2B1) transporters have been explored for their association with ATV PK modulation or with statin-related myotoxicities (SRM) development. The most convincing pharmacogenetic association with ATV remains the influence of the rs4149056 (c.521 T > C) in SLCO1B1 on ATV PK and pharmacodynamics. This SNP has been robustly associated with increased ATV systemic exposure and consequently, an increased risk of SRM. Additionally, the SNP rs2231142 (c.421C > A) in ABCG2 has also been associated with increased drug exposure and higher risk of SRM occurrence. SLCO1B1 and ABCG2 pharmacogenetic associations highlight that modulation of ATV systemic exposure is important to explain the risk of developing SRM. However, some novel observations credit the hypothesis that additional genes (e.g. SLCO2B1 or ABCC1) might be important for explaining local PK modulations within the muscle tissue, indicating that studying the local PK directly at the skeletal muscle level might pave the way for additional understanding.

Statin-related neurocognitive disorder: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.

BACKGROUND: Concerns regarding statin-related neurocognitive disorders have emerged in recent years. However, previous studies have reported inconsistent results. We evaluated the association between statins and neurocognitive disorders using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from 2004 to 2022 were obtained from the FAERS database. After deduplication and standardization of drug names, we extracted neurocognitive disorder event (NCDE) cases reported with statins as the suspected drugs. The significant association between statins and NCDE was evaluated using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component. RESULTS: In total, 6,959 NCDE cases with statins as the primary suspected drugs were identified. Signals were detected in pravastatin (ROR, 1.49; 95% CI: 1.32-1.67), atorvastatin (ROR, 1.39; 95% CI: 1.34-1.44), and simvastatin (ROR, 1.31; 95% CI: 1.25-1.38). Age-stratified analysis showed that (1) in the population aged 65 years and older, signals were detected for atorvastatin, simvastatin, rosuvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, fluvastatin, and pitavastatin; and (2) in populations under 65 years of age, signals were detected for atorvastatin, simvastatin, rosuvastatin, pravastatin, and lovastatin. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a significant association between the NCDE and statins, including atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin. The intensity of the association increased with age.

With the extensive use of statins worldwide in recent years, some patients have reported that statins lead to cognitive impairment. Researchers have conducted studies on this issue; however, the results have been inconsistent. Some believe that statins have no impact on cognitive function, while others believe they are beneficial, and others believe they have negative effects.To further investigate this issue, we analyzed data from the FDA adverse event reporting system, which collects adverse drug reactions reported by people worldwide, to evaluate the association between statins and cognitive impairment. Our findings suggest that some statins are associated with cognitive impairment. Therefore, when cognitive changes occur in patients taking statins, they should be taken seriously.

Effect of atorvastatin on muscle tissues of dermatomyositis and antisynthetase syndrome patients with dyslipidemia.

INTRODUCTION: In a recent study, we have shown that atorvastatin is clinically safe for dermatomyositis (DM) and antisynthetase syndrome (ASS) patients with dyslipidemia. Herein, we showed in an unprecedented way, the safety of atorvastatin on the muscular tissues of these patients. METHODS: Transcriptome analysis was performed on samples of the vastus lateralis muscle obtained at baseline and after 12 weeks of atorvastatin (20 mg/day) intervention in DM or ASS patients with dyslipidemia [6DM and 5ASS received atorvastatin, and 2DM and 3ASS received placebo]. The results were analyzed considering differences in expression fold change before and after treatment. Histological and histochemical analyses were also performed. RESULTS: In both groups, no significant changes were observed in genes related to the mitochondrial, oxidative, insulin, lipid, and fibrogenic pathways. Histological analysis showed a slight variability in the fiber size that was preserved after the intervention. In addition, the mosaic of muscle fibers was preserved in the internal architecture of the fibers and all histological regions. No fiber necrosis or atrophy, focal failures, subsarcolemmal accumulation, lipids, areas of fibrosis, or alterations in mitochondrial activity were observed. All muscle fibers were labeled for MHC I. CONCLUSION: Atorvastatin did not promote significant changes in the expression of genes related to mitochondrial, oxidative, insulin, lipid, and fibrogenic pathways in the muscle tissues of DM and ASS patients with dyslipidemia. Atorvastatin did not also promote histological and histochemical changes in muscle tissues. Our results reinforce the safety of the administration of atorvastatin to treat dyslipidemia in patients with DM and ASS.

Effect of Three-Day Atorvastatin Administration on Coagulation Factors in Patients With Prior Venous Thromboembolism and Healthy Subjects: A Preliminary Study.

ABSTRACT: Statins exert antithrombotic effects, which might contribute to reduced risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Rosuvastatin 20 mg/d administered for 4 weeks has been reported to decrease coagulation factors (F) VII, FVIII, and FXI in VTE patients. Moreover, in accordance with recent registry data in non-VTE subjects, statins usage was associated with lower FXI. We investigated whether 3 doses of a statin decrease coagulation factors activity and if such changes can alter fibrin clot properties in VTE patients and healthy subjects. We enrolled 28 consecutive first-ever prior VTE patients after 6 months of anticoagulation and 25 healthy controls well-matched for demographics and lipid profiles (aged 44 [interquartile range 34-51] years) in an interventional nonrandomized study. Before and after 3 doses of atorvastatin 40 mg/d, activity of FVII, FVIII, FIX, and FXI was measured, along with fibrin clot properties, including permeability (Ks) and clot lysis using 3 various assays. After a 3-day statin administration, we observed the decrease of FVII (by 6.2%, P = 0.046) and FXI (by 8.6%, P = 0.044), irrespective of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction (by 24%, P < 0.001), whereas other coagulation factors remained unaltered. Reduction of FVII and FXI activity was inversely correlated with Ks alterations (R = -0.292, P = 0.034 and R = -0.335, P = 0.014, respectively). After adjustment for age, studied group, and fibrinogen level, the reduction of FXI was independently associated with an increase of fibrin clot permeability (B = -0.084, P = 0.027). In conclusion, a 3-day 40 mg atorvastatin administration is sufficient to reduce FVII and FXI activity in our pilot study, which is associated with favorable fibrin clot properties modification.

Atorvastatin improves sputum conversion and chest X-ray severity score.

BACKGROUND: We report the results of a phase IIB study investigating the safety and effectiveness of atorvastatin use with standard anti-TB drugs.METHODS: In this multicentre, open-labelled study, we recruited treatment-naÏve patients with uncomplicated pulmonary TB aged at least 18 years. Participants were randomly assigned to standard-of-care or standard-of-care plus oral dose of atorvastatin (40 mg) daily for 2 months. Primary end points were safety measured by the number of participants with severe adverse events and effectiveness measured by the number of participants with negative sputum culture. Secondary endpoint was chest X-ray (CXR) severity score.RESULTS: Of the 185 participants screened, 150 were enrolled and equally assigned to the standard-of-care and atorvastatin groups. Adverse event severity was similar in the two groups. There was increased frequency of muscle pain in the trial group (12/75, 16% vs. 4/75, 5%). For efficacy analysis, respectively 64 (97%) and 57 (85.1%) patients in the trial and control groups had culture-negative results (P = 0.02) and experienced a reduction in CXR severity score of respectively 37% and 22%, with a mean difference of 1.4-4.9%.CONCLUSION: Atorvastatin is safe and associated with improved microbiological and radiological outcomes in TB.

ASSOCIATION OF SOLUTE CARRIER ORGANIC ANION TRANSPORTER 1B1 GENE POLYMORPHISM WITH RESPONSE TO ATORVASTATIN AND ASSOCIATED MYOPATHY IN IRAQI DYSLIPIDEMIA PATIENTS.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: The study aims to investigate the effect of solute carriers organic anions transporters 1B1 (SLCO1B1) gene polymorphisms rs4149056, rs2306283, rs55901008, and rs729559745 in a sample of patients with dyslipidemia, and relate it to atorvastatin response and associated myopathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: A cross sectional enrolled 200 patients both males and females of Arabic race, Iraqi nationality aged between 30-65 years. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (Atorvastatin responders and tolerant), Group 2 (Atorvastatin non responder and intolerant). Blood samples collected from the patients for biochemical studies and analyzed statistically by Student T-test and Chi-square, and DNA extracted for polymerase chains reactions (PCR). RESULTS: Results: The results showed insignificant association P≥0.05 between the demographic characteristics of the study population with different genotypes, and significant difference P<0.05 in the biochemical parameters regarding (T-cholesterol, triglycerides, low density lipoproteins, and Creatine kinase-MM) when comparing the two groups. Odds ratio (OR) with confidence intervals CI (95%) used to evaluate the risk association to develop myopathy and poor response to atorvastatin therapy show relevant association for CC and CT genotype of rs4149056, while rs2306283 GG genotype show low association, also rs55901008 show low association for CC genotype, and moderate association for rs72559745 genotypes GG, AG. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The mutant allele's genotypes of rs4149056, rs55901008, and rs72559745, and the wild allele genotype of rs2306283 show significant association with the development of poor response to atorvastatin and elevated the level of CK-MM plasma concentration.

Unveiling the Rare Complication: Statin-Induced Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy.

BACKGROUND Statin-induced necrotizing autoimmune myopathy is an exceptionally rare yet severe complication of statin therapy that may develop in individuals at any time during their exposure to statins. The development of proximal muscle weakness, muscle pain, and elevated creatine kinase (CK) levels in patients while taking statins should prompt clinical consideration of statin-induced myopathy. The pathophysiology arises from the production of auto-antibodies, which target the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA reductase) enzyme, leading to the aggressive breakdown of myofibrils. CASE REPORT Here, we present a case of a 59-year-old woman with a medical history of dyslipidemia who developed anti-HMG-CoA reductase antibodies after taking atorvastatin. She came to the emergency department with complaints of severe proximal muscle weakness. The laboratory workup showed an elevated CK level up to 12 000 IU/L. Despite discontinuing atorvastatin, the patient's elevated CK levels persisted. The patient underwent a muscle biopsy, demonstrating myofibril necrosis. Serological analysis showed anti-HMG-CoA reductase antibodies in the patient's serum, which led to the diagnosis of immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy due to statins. The patient's statin therapy was promptly discontinued, and she was treated with a high dose of IV corticosteroids. After the patient's discharge, brief discontinuation of the corticosteroids resulted in CK elevation and a return of symptoms. This led to the second re-admission and restarting of corticosteroids until stabilization and discharge. CONCLUSIONS This case represents an important reminder for clinicians to recognize the possibility of statin-induced immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy in patients presenting with proximal muscle weakness while taking a statin, notwithstanding the rarity of this condition.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of Shanhuang Jiangzhi tablets and atorvastatin in the treatment of patients with hyperlipidaemia.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of Shanhuang Jiangzhi tablets and atorvastatin in reducing blood lipid levels. METHODS: Patients with hyperlipidaemia admitted to the cardiac centre between January 2019 and December 2020 were included in the study. A total of 1063 patients with hyperlipidaemia took either Shanhuang Jiangzhi tablets (n = 372) or atorvastatin (n = 691) and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Clinical data, including total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, were retrospectively evaluated after propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. The adverse events were also recorded during the therapy process. RESULTS: Following PSM analysis, both groups were well matched across all parameters. Compared with the baseline, Shanhuang Jiangzhi tablets had greater effects on TC, TG and LDL-C, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the results showed that Shanhuang Jiangzhi tablets are similar to atorvastatin in reducing TC and LDL-C, and all p-values were > 0.05. However, the decrease of TG was greater in the Shanhuang Jiangzhi group (p < 0.001). Clinical adverse reactions of Shanhuang Jiangzhi tablets are rare and have no statistical significance compared with atorvastatin (p = 0.682). CONCLUSIONS: Shanhuang Jiangzhi tablets have a higher hypotriglyceridaemic performance than atorvastatin and an equivalent ability to lower TC and LDL-C. In addition, Shanhuang Jiangzhi tablets are a low-risk option for lowering blood lipids.

Rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin treatment in adults with coronary artery disease: secondary analysis of the randomised LODESTAR trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long term efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin with atorvastatin treatment in adults with coronary artery disease. DESIGN: Randomised, open label, multicentre trial. SETTING: 12 hospitals in South Korea, September 2016 to November 2019. PARTICIPANTS: 4400 adults (age ≥19 years) with coronary artery disease. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were assigned to receive either rosuvastatin (n=2204) or atorvastatin (n=2196) using 2×2 factorial randomisation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a three year composite of all cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularisation. Secondary outcomes were safety endpoints: new onset diabetes mellitus; hospital admissions due to heart failure; deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary thromboembolism; endovascular revascularisation for peripheral artery disease; aortic intervention or surgery; end stage kidney disease; discontinuation of study drugs owing to intolerance; cataract surgery; and a composite of laboratory detected abnormalities. RESULTS: 4341 of the 4400 participants (98.7%) completed the trial. Mean daily dose of study drugs was 17.1 mg (standard deviation (SD) 5.2 mg) in the rosuvastatin group and 36.0 (12.8) mg in the atorvastatin group at three years (P<0.001). The primary outcome occurred in 189 participants (8.7%) in the rosuvastatin group and 178 (8.2%) in the atorvastatin group (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.30; P=0.58). The mean low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level during treatment was 1.8 mmol/L (SD 0.5 mmol/L) in the rosuvastatin group and 1.9 (0.5) mmol/L in the atorvastatin group (P<0.001). The rosuvastatin group had a higher incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus requiring initiation of antidiabetics (7.2% v 5.3%; hazard ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.87; P=0.03) and cataract surgery (2.5% v 1.5%; 1.66, 1.07 to 2.58; P=0.02). Other safety endpoints did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with coronary artery disease, rosuvastatin and atorvastatin showed comparable efficacy for the composite outcome of all cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularisation at three years. Rosuvastatin was associated with lower LDL cholesterol levels but a higher risk of new onset diabetes mellitus requiring antidiabetics and cataract surgery compared with atorvastatin. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02579499.

Genetic polymorphisms in ABCB1 are correlated with the increased risk of atorvastatin-induced muscle side effects: a cross-sectional study.

Genetic factors are recognized as risk factors for statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS), which are the most common cause of statin intolerance. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is an association between polymorphisms 1236C > T, 2677G > T/A, and 3435C > T in the ABCB1 gene, encoding the efflux transporter of statins, and SAMS, as results on this topic are still controversial. A cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with or without SAMS using atorvastatin. The influence of non-genetic variables on SAMS was also evaluated. Our results show that patients with TT genotype in 1236C > T, 2677G > T/A, and 3435C > T polymorphisms had higher risk of developing SAMS, compared to wild type and heterozygous carriers together (OR 4.292 p = 0.0093, OR 5.897 p = 0.0023 and OR 3.547 p = 0.0122, respectively). Furthermore, TTT/TTT diplotype was also associated with a higher risk of SAMS, OR 9.234 (p = 0.0028). Only family history of cardiovascular disease was found to be a risk factor for SAMS, in addition to the known non-genetic variables. We believe that ABCB1 genotyping has great potential to be incorporated into clinical practice to identify high-risk patients in a timely manner.

Association between CYP3A4/CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms and treatment outcomes of atorvastatin worldwide: is there enough research on the Egyptian population?

INTRODUCTION: Atorvastatin is regarded as the most frequently prescribed statin worldwide for dyslipidemia. However, clinical response and risk of adverse effects to statin therapy are associated with genetic variations. Numerous research linked statins pharmacokinetics (PK) variations to genetic polymorphisms in cytochromes P450 (CYPs) metabolic enzymes. OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the association between CYP3A4/5 genetic variations and response to atorvastatin therapy globally, which includes atorvastatin PK, and the risk for adverse reactions, with a hint to the Egyptians. METHODS: Up to March 30, 2022, electronic medical databases like PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB) were searched. All articles that highlighted the relationship between CYP3A4/5 genetic polymorphisms and atorvastatin efficacy/safety profile were included in this review. RESULTS: Initially, 492 articles were retrieved after an exhaustive search. There were 24 articles included according to the inclusion criteria. Findings of association studies of CYP3A4/5 genetic polymorphisms with response to atorvastatin varied among different ethnicities. CYP3A4*1B was associated with better therapeutic outcomes after atorvastatin therapy in Chileans and vice versa in Americans. Caucasians with myalgia while using atorvastatin were at significant risk of suffering severe muscle damage if they were carriers of CYP3A5*3/*3. As far as we can report for the Egyptian population, the impact of CYP3A4/5 genetic variations on the response to atorvastatin therapy was understudied. CONCLUSION: More pharmacogenetic studies amongst diverse populations worldwide, like the Egyptian population, are necessary to detect further atorvastatin-gene interactions.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, statin therapy, and cerebral microbleeds: The CIRCLE study.

BACKGROUND: Current evidence suggests a potential association between cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, and statin use, but the exact relationship remains unclear. This study aims to prospectively examine these relationships in a stroke-free population. METHODS: From January 2010 to January 2020, we enrolled stroke-free individuals with at least one cerebral small vessel disease imaging marker from the CIRCLE study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03542734). Participants underwent baseline and 1-year follow-up susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), and baseline LDL-C testing. New CMBs were categorized as strictly lobar and deep CMBs based on location. RESULTS: A total of 209 individuals were included. Baseline serum LDL-C levels were divided into quartiles: Q1 (≤1.76 mmol/L), Q2 (1.77-2.36 mmol/L), Q3 (2.37-2.93 mmol/L), and Q4 (>2.93 mmol/L). The incidence of new deep CMBs was 30.0%, 11.1%, 10.9%, 8.2% in Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, respectively. Multivariate logistic model revealed that only LDL-C in Q1 was associated with increased incidence of new deep CMBs (OR = 4.256; 95% CI: 1.156-15.666; p = 0.029). In a subset of 169 participants without prior statin use, the use of atorvastatin was associated with reduced occurrence of new deep CMBs (OR = 0.181; 95% CI: 0.035-0.928; p = 0.040), while it was not found with rosuvastatin (OR = 0.808; 95% CI: 0.174-3.741; p = 0.785). CONCLUSIONS: While lower LDL-C levels were associated with higher CMB development, statin therapy did not increase the risk of new CMBs. Atorvastatin even demonstrated a protective effect.

Randomized, multicenter, parallel, open, phase 4 study to compare the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin/amlodipine polypill versus atorvastatin/amlodipine polypill in hypertension patient with dyslipidemia.

The authors performed this study to investigate the efficacy and safety of a rosuvastatin (RSV)/amlodipine (AML) polypill compared with those of atorvastatin (ATV)/AML polypill. We included 259 patients from 21 institutions in Korea. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: RSV 10 mg/AML 5 mg, RSV 20 mg/AML 5 mg, or ATV 20 mg /AML 5 mg. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of the RSV 10.20 mg/AML 5 mg via percentage changes in LDL-C after 8 weeks of treatment, compared with the ATV 20 mg /AML 5 mg. There was a significant difference in the mean percentage change of LDL-C at 8 weeks between the RSV 10 mg/AML 5 mg and the ATV 20 mg/AML 5 mg (full analysis set [FAS]: -7.08%, 95% CI: -11.79 to -2.38, p = .0034, per-protocol analysis set [PPS]: -6.97%, 95% CI: -11.76 to -2.19, p = .0046). Also, there was a significant difference in the mean percentage change of LDL-C at 8 weeks between the RSV 20 mg/AML 5 mg and the ATV 20 mg/AML 5 mg (FAS: -10.13%, 95% CI: -15.41 to -4.84, p = .0002, PPS: -10.96%, 95% CI: -15.98 to -5.93, p < .0001). There was no significant difference in the adverse events rates between RSV 10 mg/AML 5 mg, RSV 20 mg/AML 5 mg, and ATV 20 mg/AML 5 mg. In conclusion, while maintaining safety, RSV 10 mg/AML 5 mg and the RSV 20 mg/AML 5 mg more effectively reduced LDL-C compared with the ATV 20 mg /AML 5 mg (Clinical trial: NCT03951207).

[Statin-related drug-induced liver injury].

Statins are a kind of prescription drug that is widely used to treat hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, and other atherosclerotic diseases. A common side effect of statin use is a mild rise in liver aminotransferases, which occurs in less than 3% of patients. Statin-related liver injury is most commonly caused by atorvastatin and simvastatin, but severe liver injury is uncommon. Therefore, understanding and evaluating hepatotoxicity and weighing the benefits and risks is of great significance to better realize the protective effect of statins.

Real-world pharmacogenetics of statin intolerance: effects of SLCO1B1, ABCG2 , and CYP2C9 variants.

OBJECTIVE: The association of SLCO1B1 c.521T>C with simvastatin-induced muscle toxicity is well characterized. However, different statins are subject to metabolism and transport also by other proteins exhibiting clinically meaningful genetic variation. Our aim was to investigate associations of SLCO1B1 c.521T>C with intolerance to atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, or simvastatin, those of ABCG2 c.421C>A with intolerance to atorvastatin, fluvastatin, or rosuvastatin, and that of CYP2C9*2 and *3 alleles with intolerance to fluvastatin. METHODS: We studied the associations of these variants with statin intolerance in 2042 patients initiating statin therapy by combining genetic data from samples from the Helsinki Biobank to clinical chemistry and statin purchase data. RESULTS: We confirmed the association of SLCO1B1 c.521C/C genotype with simvastatin intolerance both by using phenotype of switching initial statin to another as a marker of statin intolerance [hazard ratio (HR) 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-3.25, P  = 0.025] and statin switching along with creatine kinase measurement (HR 5.44, 95% CI 1.49-19.9, P  = 0.011). No significant association was observed with atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. The sample sizes for fluvastatin and pravastatin were relatively small, but SLCO1B1 c.521T>C carriers had an increased risk of pravastatin intolerance defined by statin switching when compared to homozygous reference T/T genotype (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.01-4.39, P  = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The current results can inform pharmacogenetic statin prescribing guidelines and show feasibility for the methodology to be used in larger future studies.